A “new” report on rural electrification in Peru demonstrates the usefulness of conducting energy surveys to help with assessing policies for such programs. The usefulness stems from the ability to not only estimate the benefits of rural electrification, but to analyze if the subsidy policies are both effective and well targeted. There are many ways to structure subsidies for rural electrification in developing countries (see previous blog on energy subsidies). Some types of subsidies can be progressive and others well could be regressive. Assessing the appropriativeness type of subsidy generally is difficult to do without energy survey information.
Rural Energy Expenditures by Income Class in Peru in Soles per Month (1 US$ = 3 Soles) Source: Peru National Survey of Rural Energy Use |
In developing countries generally people with higher income spend more cash income on energy than those with lower levels of income. This same pattern can be found in Peru as indicated by the figure. It is somewhat expected that electricity and LPG expenditures in rural Peru increase significantly with increases in income as measured by total expenditures. But interestingly even cash expenditures on fuelwood rise with income which indicates that there is even a willingness to pay for what is probably high quality fuelwood. One reason that it is necessary to have quality surveys is to track both the effectiveness and the targeting of subsidies.